Originally published at: Pluralistic: We should ban TikTok(‘s surveillance) (30 Mar 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow
- We should ban TikTok('s surveillance): And Google's, Apple's, and Facebook's surveillance, too.
- Hey look at this: Delights to delectate.
- This day in history: 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2022
- Colophon: Recent publications, upcoming/recent appearances, current writing projects, current reading
We should ban TikTok('s surveillance) (permalink)
With the RESTRICT Act, Congress is proposing to continue Trump's war on Tiktok, enacting a US ban on the Chinese-owned service. How will they do this? Congress isn't clear. In practice, banning stuff on the internet is hard, especially if you don't have a national firewall:
My guess is that they're thinking of ordering the mobile duopoly of Google and Apple to nuke the Tiktok app from their app stores. That's how they do it in China, after all: when China wanted to ban VPNs and other privacy tools, they just ordered Apple to remove them from the App Store, and Apple rolled over:
That's the completely foreseeable consequence of arrogating the power to decide which software every mobile user on earth is entitled to use – as Google and Apple have done. Once you put that gun on the mantelpiece in Act I, you damn betcha that some strong-man backed by a powerful state is going to come along and shoot it by Act III.
The same goes for commercial surveillance: once you collect massive, nonconsensual dossiers on every technology user alive, you don't get to act surprised when cops and spies show up and order your company to serve as deputies for a massive, off-the-books warrantless surveillance project.
Hell, a cynic might even say that commercial surveillance companies are betting on this. The surveillance public-private partnership is a vicious cycle: corporations let cops and spies plunder our data; then the cops and spies lobby against privacy laws that would prevent these corporations from spying on us:
Which makes the RESTRICT Act an especially foolish project. If the Chinese state wants to procure data on Americans, it need not convince us to install Tiktok. It can simply plunk down a credit card with any of the many unregulated data-brokers who feed the American tech giants the dossiers that the NSA and local cops rely on.
Every American tech giant is at least as bad for privacy as Tiktok is – yes, even Apple. Sure, Apple lets its users block Facebook spying with a single tap – but even if you opt out of "tracking," Apple still secretly gathers exactly the same kinds of data as Facebook, and uses it to power its own ad product:
There is no such thing as a privacy-respecting tech giant. Long before Apple plastered our cities with lying billboards proclaiming its reverence for privacy, Microsoft positioned itself as the non-spying alternative to Google, which would be great, except Microsoft spies on hundreds of millions of people and sells the data:
Tech's surveillance addiction means that Tiktok's own alternative to the RESTRICT Act is also unbelievably stupid. The company has proposed to put itself under Oracle's supervision, letting Oracle host its data and audit its code. You know, Oracle, the company that built the Great Firewall of China 1.0:
We should not trust Tiktok anymore than we trust Apple, Facebook, Google or Microsoft. Tiktok lied about whether it was sending data to China before:
And even if it keeps its promise not to send user data to China, that promise is meaningless – it can still send the vectors and models it creates with that data to China – these being far more useful for things like disinformation campaigns and population-scale inferences than the mere logs from your Tiktok sessions.
There are so many potentially harmful ways to process commercial surveillance data that trying to enumerate all the things that a corporation is allowed to do with the data it extracts from us is a fool's errand. Instead, we should ban companies from spying on us, whether they are Chinese or American.
Corporations are remorseless, paperclip-maximizing colony organisms that perceive us as inconvenient gut-flora, and they lack any executive function (as do their "executives"), and they cannot self-regulate. To keep corporations from harming us, we must make it illegal for them to enact harm, and punish them when they break the law:
After all, the problem with Tiktok isn't the delightful videos or the fact that it's teaching a generation of children to be expert sound- and video-editors. The problem with Tiktok is that it spies on us. Just like the problem with Facebook isn't that it lets us communicate with our friends, and the problem with Google isn't that it operates a search engine.
Now, these companies will tell you that the two can't be separated, that a bearded prophet came down off a mountain with two stone tablets, intoning, "Larry, Sergey, thou shalt stop rotating thine logfiles and, lo, thou wilt data-mine them for actionable market intelligence." But it's nonsense. Google ran for years without surveillance. Facebook billed itself as the privacy-forward alternative to Myspace and promised never to spy on us:
The inevitabilist narrative that says that corporations must violate our rights in order to make the products we love is unadulterated Mr Gotcha nonsense: "Yet you participate in society. Curious. I am very intelligent":
Of course, corporations push this narrative all the time, which is why American Big Tech has been quietly supporting a ban on Tiktok, which (coincidentally) has managed to gain a foothold in the otherwise impregnable, decaying, enshittified oligarchy that US companies have created.
They have conspicuously failed to call for any kind of working solution, like a federal privacy law that would ban commercial surveillance, and extend a "private right of action," so people could sue tech giants and data-brokers who violated the law, without having to convince a regulator, DA or Attorney General to bestir themselves:
Instead, the tech giants have the incredible gall to characterize themselves as the defenders of our privacy – at least, so long as the Chinese government is the adversary, and so long as its privacy violations come via an app, and not buy handing a credit card to the data-brokers that are the soil bacteria that keeps Big Tech's ecosystem circulating. In the upside-down land of Big Tech lobbying, privacy is a benefit of monopoly – not something we have to smash monopolies to attain:
Not everyone in Congress is onboard with the RESTRICT Act. AOC has come out for a federal privacy law that applies to all companies, rather than a ban on an app that tens of millions of young Americans love:
You know who agrees with AOC? Rand Paul. Yes, that absolute piece of shit. Paul told his caucusmates in the GOP that banning an app that millions of young American voters love is bad electoral politics. This fact is so obvious that even Rand fucking Paul can understand it:
Paul is absolutely right to call a Tiktok ban a "national strategy to permanently lose elections for a generation." The Democrats should listen to him, because the GOP won't. As between the two parties, the GOP is far more in thrall to the Chamber of Commerce and the rest of the business lobby. They are never going to back a policy that's as good for the people and as bad for big business as a federal privacy law.
The Democrats have the opportunity to position themselves as "the party that wants to keep Tiktok but force it to stop being creepy, along with all the other tech companies," while the GOP positions itself as "the party of angry technophobes who want to make sure that any fun you have is closely monitored by Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pinchai and Tim Cook and their pale imitations of the things you love about Tiktok."
That's not just good electoral politics – it's good policy. Young voters aren't going to turn out to the polls for performative Cold War 2.0 nonsense, but they will be pissed as hell at whoever takes away their Tiktok.
And if you do care about Cold War 2.0, then you should be banning surveillance, not Tiktok; the Chinese government has plenty of US dollars at its disposal to spend in America's freewheeling, unregulated data markets – as do criminals, petty and organized, and every other nation-state adversary of the USA.
The RESTRICT Act is a garbage law straight out of the Clinton era, a kind of King Canute decree that goes so far as to potentially prohibit the use of VPNs to circumvent its provisions. America doesn't need a Great Firewall to keep itself safe from tech spying – it needs a privacy law.
(Image: Cryteria, CC BY 3.0, modified)
Hey look at this (permalink)
- The Three-Legged Stool: A Manifesto for a Smaller, Denser Internet https://publicinfrastructure.org/2023/03/29/the-three-legged-stool/
A misleading open letter about sci-fi AI dangers ignores the real risks https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/a-misleading-open-letter-about-sci
This day in history (permalink)
#20yrsago Weezer’s symbolic value https://web.archive.org/web/20190519021721/https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~mustaste/weezerthesis.htm
#15yrsago Griefers deface epilepsy message-board with seizure-inducing animations https://www.wired.com/2008/03/hackers-assault-epilepsy-patients-via-computer/
#15yrsago London’s Spitalfields market: shoot the architecture, we take away your camera https://memex.craphound.com/2008/03/30/remixed-generic-thrift-store-clothes/
#15yrsago Remixed generic thrift-store clothes https://memex.craphound.com/2008/03/30/remixed-generic-thrift-store-clothes/
#10yrsago Embarrassingly obvious undercover cops take to Twitter looking for house shows https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2013/03/boston-police-catfishing-indie-rockers-cops-pose-as-punks-on-the-internet.html
#10yrsago Mr Unpronounceable Adventures, spectacularly weird graphic novel in a Lovecraftian/Burroughsian vein https://memex.craphound.com/2013/03/30/mr-unpronounceable-adventures-spectacularly-weird-graphic-novel-in-a-lovecraftian-burroughsian-vein/
#10yrsago Group whose Wikipedia entry was deleted for non-notability threatens lawsuit against Wikipedian who participated in the discussion https://mako.cc/copyrighteous/the-institute-for-cultural-diplomacy-and-wikipedia
#5yrsago Georgia criminalizes routine security research https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/georgia-passes-anti-infosec-legislation
#5yrsago Trump administration will require every visitor to the USA to divulge all social media identities https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-29/us-to-seek-social-media-details-from-all-visa-applicants
#5yrsago Facebook deathwatch: a decade ago, it was impossible to imagine the fall of Myspace https://memex.craphound.com/2018/03/30/facebook-deathwatch-a-decade-ago-it-was-impossible-to-imagine-the-fall-of-myspace/
#5yrsago Oklahoma teachers walk out, sensing weakness from GOP legislators who caved on taxing the oil industry https://jacobin.com/2018/03/oklahoma-teachers-strike-west-virginia/
#5yrsago Referendums and low-engagement voters produce catastrophic outcomes (but what about corruption?) https://timharford.com/2018/03/how-referendums-break-democracies/
#5yrsago Five years after Google conquered and abandoned RSS, the news-reader ecosystem is showing green shoots https://www.wired.com/story/rss-readers-feedly-inoreader-old-reader/
#5yrsago “Kingpin: The Hunt for El Chapo”: Game designers review the CIA’s declassified tabletop training game https://www.vice.com/en/article/3kjkx8/cia-el-chapo-kingpin-board-game-review
#1yrago Hackers' code-free exploit: pretend to be cops https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/30/lawful-interception/#edrs
Today's top sources:
- A Little Brother short story about DIY insulin PLANNING
Picks and Shovels, a Martin Hench noir thriller about the heroic era of the PC. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW
The Bezzle, a Martin Hench noir thriller novel about the prison-tech industry. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, WAITING FOR EDITORIAL REVIEW
Vigilant, Little Brother short story about remote invigilation. ON SUBMISSION
Moral Hazard, a short story for MIT Tech Review's 12 Tomorrows. FIRST DRAFT COMPLETE, ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION
Spill, a Little Brother short story about pipeline protests. ON SUBMISSION
Latest podcast: Red Team Blues https://craphound.com/news/2023/03/26/red-team-blues/
- Antitrust and Competition Conference – Beyond the Consumer Welfare Standard (Chicago), Apr 20-21
Red Team Blues at Mysterious Galaxy (San Diego), Apr 25
Red Team Blues at Dark Delicacies (Burbank), Apr 26
Bay Area Bookfest (Berkeley), May 6/7
Open Source Summit (Vancouver), May 10
Wordfest (Calgary), May 11
Red Team Blues event with Tim Harford (Oxford), May 29
Red Team Blues event with Ian Forrester (Manchester), May 31
UCL Peter Kirstein Lecture, Jun 1 (London):
- Is Copyright Good For Authors? (This Week in Tech)
Culture Journalist: What is chokepoint capitalism?
Techtonic with Mark Hurst | WFMU
- "Chokepoint Capitalism: How to Beat Big Tech, Tame Big Content, and Get Artists Paid, with Rebecca Giblin", on how to unrig the markets for creative labor, Beacon Press/Scribe 2022 https://chokepointcapitalism.com
"Attack Surface": The third Little Brother novel, a standalone technothriller for adults. The Washington Post called it "a political cyberthriller, vigorous, bold and savvy about the limits of revolution and resistance." Order signed, personalized copies from Dark Delicacies https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1840/Available_Now%3A_Attack_Surface.html
"How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism": an anti-monopoly pamphlet analyzing the true harms of surveillance capitalism and proposing a solution. https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59 (print edition: https://bookshop.org/books/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/9781736205907) (signed copies: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2024/Available_Now%3A__How_to_Destroy_Surveillance_Capitalism.html)
"Little Brother/Homeland": A reissue omnibus edition with a new introduction by Edward Snowden: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250774583; personalized/signed copies here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p1750/July%3A__Little_Brother_%26_Homeland.html
"Poesy the Monster Slayer" a picture book about monsters, bedtime, gender, and kicking ass. Order here: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781626723627. Get a personalized, signed copy here: https://www.darkdel.com/store/p2682/Corey_Doctorow%3A_Poesy_the_Monster_Slayer_HB.html#/.
- Red Team Blues: "A grabby, compulsive thriller that will leave you knowing more about how the world works than you did before." Tor Books, April 2023
The Internet Con: A nonfiction book about interoperability and Big Tech, Verso, September 2023
The Lost Cause: a post-Green New Deal eco-topian novel about truth and reconciliation with white nationalist militias, Tor Books, November 2023
This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. That means you can use it any way you like, including commercially, provided that you attribute it to me, Cory Doctorow, and include a link to pluralistic.net.
Quotations and images are not included in this license; they are included either under a limitation or exception to copyright, or on the basis of a separate license. Please exercise caution.
How to get Pluralistic:
Blog (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Newsletter (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Mastodon (no ads, tracking, or data-collection):
Medium (no ads, paywalled):
(Latest Medium column: "Silicon Valley Noir: Red Team Blues and the Role of Bitterness in Technothrillers" https://doctorow.medium.com/silicon-valley-noir-35c014c4c493)
Twitter (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
Tumblr (mass-scale, unrestricted, third-party surveillance and advertising):
"When life gives you SARS, you make sarsaparilla" -Joey "Accordion Guy" DeVilla